Restored Riparian Buffers as Tools for Ecosystem Restoration in the MAIA; Processes, Endpoints, and Measures of Success for Water, Soil, Flora, and Fauna

Riparian buffer restorations are used as management tools to produce favorable water quality impacts, moreover among the many benefits riparian buffers may provide, their application as instruments for water quality restoration rests on a relatively firm foundation of research. However, the extent to which buffers can restore riparian ecosystems; their functionality and species composition, are essentially unknown. In light of the foregoing, two broad areas of research are indicated. First, data are needed to document the relative effectiveness of riparian buffers that differ according to width, length, and plant species composition. These questions, of managing buffer dimension and species composition for functionality, are of central importance even when attenuation of nutrient and sediment loads alone are considered. Second, where ecosystem restoration is the goal, effects to in-stream and terrestrial riparian biota need to be considered. Relatedly, the effects of the restoration on the landscape need to be considered. Particularly, at what rate do the effects of the riparian buffer on in-stream water quality, biota, and habitat diminish downstream from restored sites? Answers to these important questions are needed, for streams and watersheds of different size and for areas of differing soil type within watersheds. U.S. EPA-NRMRL has initiated as research project that will document the potential for buffers to restore riparian ecosystems; focusing on water quality effects, but also, importantly, documenting effects on biota. While substantial riparian buffer management initiatives are already underway, the extent of landscapes that influence riparian ecosystems in the eastern United States is large; leaving ample opportunity for this suggested research to provide improved buffer designs in the future. The ultimate goal of research projects developed under this paradigm of ecosystem restoration is to develop data that are needed to implement riparian buffer restorations in the mid-Atlantic and elsewhere, especially the eastern United States.     

Evaluation of methods for sorting CCA-treated wood

Construction and demolition (C&D) wood frequently contains treated wood including wood treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA). Many recycling options for such wood require that the product be essentially free of preservative chemicals. The objectives of this study were to document the characteristics of the wood waste stream and to evaluate the effectiveness of sorting methods for identifying treated wood. Sorting methods evaluated included visual sorting and visual sorting augmented with the use of PAN indicator stain and/or hand-held X-ray fluorescence (XRF) units. Experiments were conducted on two types of construction and demolition (C&D) wood: source separated loads containing only C&D wood and wood hand-picked from commingled loads of general C&D waste. Results showed that 77% of the treated wood was CCA-treated. For uncontaminated piles (<1% treated wood) of source separated C&D wood, visual sorting was found to effectively remove the small amounts of treated wood present. For piles of source separated wood that were contaminated (approximately 50% treated wood), visual sorts were not accurate and benefited from augmented sorting using PAN indicator stain. The handheld XRF devices were found to be effective for sorting commingled C&D wood, as PAN indicator stain was not as effective due to the excessive amount of surface dirt associated with commingled wood waste. Visual sorting of source separated wood was estimated to cost between US$21 to US$96 per metric ton. These costs depended upon the amount of treated wood and whether or not augmentation with PAN indicator was necessary. Visual sorting augmented with hand-held XRF units was estimated at US$113 per metric ton. The bulk of these costs were associated with labor. Future efforts should focus on reducing labor costs by mounting automated XRF units on conveyor systems.     

Investigation of the Jahn Foundry and CTA Acoustics dust explosions: similarities and differences

The Jahn Foundry in Springfield, Massachusetts and CTA Acoustics in Corbin, Kentucky experienced devastating dust explosions in 1999 and 2003, respectively. At the time, Jahn Foundry was a gray iron casting facility that used phenolic resin powder as a binder for sand molds. CTA Acoustics was a manufacturer of thermal acoustic insulation that used phenolic resin powder as a binder for fiberglass mats. In both facilities the phenolic resin was able to migrate from the process, accumulate in the facility, and fuel catastrophic dust explosions.In this paper we review Exponent's investigation of the two incidents and identify root causes of the incidents and applicable standards that, if followed, could have prevented or mitigated the incidents. Throughout the paper we identify similarities and differences between the two facilities. For instance, in both facilities hazardous levels of dust had been allowed to accumulate due, in part, to inadequate housekeeping. However, a significant difference between the two facilities was that Jahn Foundry had no dust collection systems while the CTA Acoustics facility had dust collection systems designed to minimize the release of dust into the plant. The paper summarizes lessons learned from these two incidents that should be remembered when designing new facilities and analyzing hazards at existing facilities.     

Transaction costs for carbon sequestration projects in the tropical forest sector

There is general consensus that carbon (C) sequestration projects in forests are a relatively low cost option for mitigating climate change, but most studies on the subject have assumed that transaction costs are negligible. The objectives of the study were to examine transaction costs for forest C sequestration projects and to determine the significance of the costs based on economic analyses. Here we examine four case studies of active C sequestration projects being implemented in tropical countries and developed for the C market. The results from the case studies were then used with a dynamic forest and land use economic model to investigate how transaction costs affect the efficiency and cost of forest C projects globally. In the case studies transaction costs ranged from 0.38 to 27 million US dollars ($0.09 to $7.71/t CO₂) or 0.3 to 270 % of anticipated income depending principally on the price of C and project size. The three largest cost categories were insurance (under the voluntary market; 41–89 % of total costs), monitoring (3–42 %) and regulatory approval (8–50 %). The global analysis indicated that most existing estimates of marginal costs of C sequestration are underestimated by up to 30 % because transaction costs were not included.     

A Combined Ca(OH)2/NH3 Flue Gas Desulfurization Process for High Sulfur Coal: Results of a Pilot Plant Study

The removal of SO₂ with atomization of a slaked lime slurry and supplemental injection of gaseous NH₃ were tested in a conventional spray dryer/baghouse system for SO₂ concentrations of 2000 ppm and 3000 ppm and a 30° F approach to saturation. Results at 3000 ppm of SO₂ showed an average SO₂ removal efficiency of 90.3 percent at a combined stoichiometric ratio of 0.95-1.10 and an average overall sorbent utilization of 91.6 percent. The overall molal ratio of NH₃/SO₂ reaction was found to be 2:1 under the test conditions Particle size analyses, and EP toxicity tests were conducted on the products of the reactions.     

Applicability of the Mass Concentration Standards for Particulate Matter in Alaskan Areas

The so-called “Six Month Study” of the air toxics problem in the United States was initiated in November 1983 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The study focused on the magnitude, nature, and distribution of the problem—three major issues that were felt to be most useful to policy makers as they attempted to define the scope and direction of a national program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The following paper is based on a draft staff report on the study released for review in September 1984. The report has not been formally released by the U.S. EPA; a final report is due by late spring of 1985.     

Field evaluation of resistivity sensors for in situ moisture measurement in a bioreactor landfill

The ability of resistance-based sensors to measure in situ waste moisture content in a landfill was examined. One hundred and thirty-five resistance-based sensors were installed in a leachate recirculation well field at a bioreactor landfill in Florida, US. The performance of these sensors was studied for a period of over 6 years. The sensors were found to respond to an increase in moisture resulting from leachate recirculation. It was observed that 78% of sensors worked successfully in the field during the study period. The initial spatial average moisture content determined by the sensor readings (using a laboratory-derived calibration) was 42.8% compared to 23% from gravimetric readings. Eighteen sensors (13%) showed that they were saturated before liquid addition, and no change in moisture content was observed in these sensors during the study period. Laboratory-derived calibration methods resulted in an over-estimation of moisture content. An alternate field-calibration method, where wetted sensor output was assumed equal to the average of gravimetric measurements for wet samples, was evaluated. The final spatial average moisture contents were 64.2% and 44.4% for the laboratory-derived and field-derived calibration methodologies, respectively, compared to 45% measured gravimetrically from excavated waste samples. When moisture content was determined using a mass balance approach, the result was 34.6%. The results suggest that when appropriately calibrated, resistivity-based sensors can be used to obtain a reasonably accurate estimate of local moisture content. However, caution should be taken to extend the moisture content values that are representative of waste surrounding the sensors to estimate the overall moisture content on the landfill-wide scale.